Clinical Applications of OAEs (in alphabetical order by author name)



  • Clinical Studies of Medial Olivocochlear Function . by Charles I. Berlin, PhD ;Linda Hood PhD ; Thierry Morlet, PhD; and Shanda Brashears, MCD
    Level Intermediate
    Total File size 1451 k
    Preview page Available (100k)

    Abstract:

    The on-line lecture is an abridged version from a lecture Dr. Berlin presented during the ARO meeting of 2001. In this presentation, Dr. Berlin, summarizes several years of research on the medial efferent olivocochlearsystem (MOCS) in humans. Studies of otoacoustic emission suppression haveshown that the MOCS effect is reliable and valid and exits separately fromthe middle ear muscle reflex. Dr. Berlin explains what parameters should beused to elicit the medial olivocochlear reflex and what results should beexpected according to age and hearing condition.



  • Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in relation to hearing loss.I. A Brief Overview . by Michael Gorga Ph.D. and Steve Neely D.Sc.
    Level Basic
    Number of Slides 12
    Total file size 467 k
    Preview page Available (85K)

    Abstract:




  • Distortion product otoacoustic emissions in relation to hearing loss.II. Factors Affecting DPOAE Test Performance . by Michael Gorga Ph.D. and Steve Neely D.Sc.
    Level Intermediate
    Number of Slides 29
    Total file size 955 k
    Preview page Available (133k)

    Abstract:




  • DPOAEs in Normal Ears. by Michael Gorga Ph.D. and Steve Neely D.Sc.
    Level Intermediate
    Number of Slides 30
    Total file size 1027 k
    Preview page Available (123K)

    Abstract:




  • DPOAE Suppression Tuning Curves in Normal and Impaired Human Ears . by Michael Gorga, Stephen T. Neely, Darcia Dierking, Patricia A. Dorn, Brenda Hoover, and Denis Fitzpatrick
    Level Advanced
    Number of Slides 58
    Total file size 2200 k
    Preview page NOT Available

    Abstract:

    Distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) suppression measurements were made in 20 subjects with normal hearing and 21 subjects with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. The probe consisted of two primary tones (f2,f1), with f2 held constant at 4 kHz and f2/f1 = 1.22. Primary levels (L1,L2) were set according to the equation L1=0.4L2 +39 dB (Kummer et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444, 1998), withL2 ranging from 20 to 70 dB SPL (normal-hearing subjects) and 50 -70 dB SPL (subjects with hearing loss). Responses elicited by the probe were suppressed by a third tone (f3), varying in frequency from 1 octave below to 1/2 octave above f2. Suppressor level (L3) varied from 5 to 85 dB SPL. Responses in the presence of the suppressor were subtracted from the unsuppressed condition in order to convert the data into decrements (amount of suppression). The slopes of the decrement versus L3 functions were less steep for lower frequency suppressors and more steep for higher frequency suppressors in impaired ears. Suppression tuning curves, constructed by selecting the L3 that resulted in 3 dB of suppression as a function of f3, resulted in tuning curves that were similar in appearance for normal and impaired ears. Although variable,Q10 and QERB were slightly larger in impaired ears regardless of whether the comparisons were made at equivalent SPL or equivalent sensation levels (SL). Larger tip-to-tail differences were observed in ears with normal hearing when compared at either the same SPL or the same SL, with a much larger effect at similar SL. These results are consistent with the view that subjects with normal hearing and mild-to-moderate hearing loss have similar tuning around a frequency for which the hearing loss exists, but reduced cochlear-amplifier gain

             Dr Gorga has made available also the original JASA articles from which the above presentation was based :



  • Establishing DPOAE Criteria for Use in the Clinic.I. Overview of the Problem. by Michael Gorga Ph.D. and Steve Neely D.Sc.
    Level Intermediate
    Number of Slides 18
    Total file size 707 k
    Preview page Available (128k)

    Abstract:




  • Establishing DPOAE Criteria for Use in the Clinic.II. Constructing a Clinical Form . by Michael Gorga Ph.D. and Steve Neely D.Sc.
    Level Intermediate
    Number of Slides 14
    Total file size 557 k
    Preview page Available (99k)

    Abstract:




  • Establishing DPOAE Criteria for Use in the Clinic.III. Case Studies . by Michael Gorga Ph.D. and Steve Neely D.Sc.
    Level Intermediate
    Number of Slides 26
    Total file size 868 k
    Preview page Available (127k)

    Abstract:




  • DPOAE I/O Functions in Normal and Impaired Human Ears . by Patricia Dorn, Dawn Konrad-Martin,Stephen Neely, Douglas Keefe, EmilyCyr and Michael Gorga. Summarized from JASA 110 (280 k) , pages 3119-3131.
    Level Advanced
    Number of Slides 29
    Total file size 656 k
    Preview page None

    Abstract:

    DPOAE input/output I/O functions were measured at 7 f2frequencies (1 to 8 kHz;f2/f1 =1.22) over a range of levels -5 to 95dBSPL in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired human ears. L1-L2was level dependent in order to produce the largest 2f1-f2 responses in normal ears. System distortion was determined by collecting DP data in six different acoustic cavities. These data were used to derive a multiple linear regression model to predict system distortion levels. The model was tested on cochlear-implant users and used to estimate system distortion in all other ears. At most but not all f2's, measurements in cochlear implant ears were consistent with model predictions. At all f2frequencies, the ears with normal auditory thresholds produced I/O functions characterized by compressive nonlinear regions at moderate levels, with more rapid growth at low and high stimulus levels. As auditory threshold increased, DPOAE threshold increased, accompanied by DPOAE amplitude reductions, notably over the range of levels where normal ears showed compression. The slope of the I/O function was steeper in impaired ears. The data from normal-hearing ears resembled direct measurements of basilar membrane displacement in lower animals. Data from ears with hearing loss showed that the compressive region was affected by cochlear damage; however, responses at high levels of stimulation resembled those observed in normal ears



  • Predicting Behavioral Thresholds From DPOAE I/O Functions . by Michael P. Gorga, Stephen T. Neely, Patricia A. Dorn, and Brenda M.Hoover. Summarized from JASA 113, ( 136 k) pages 3275-3284.
    Level Advanced
    Number of Slides 35
    Total file size 2700 k
    Preview page None

    Abstract:

    Recently, Boege and Janssen (J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111, 1810 -1818, 2002) fit linear equations to distortion product otoacoustic emission DPOAE input/output I/O functions after the DPOAE level (in dB SPL) was converted into pressure (uPa). Significant correlations were observed between these DPOAE thresholds and audiometric thresholds. The present study extends their work by (1) evaluating the effect of frequency,(2) determining the behavioral thresholds in those conditions that did not meet inclusion criteria, and (3) including a wider range of stimulus levels. DPOAE I/O functions were measured in as many as 278 ears of subjects with normal and impaired hearing. Nine f2frequencies (500 to 8000 Hz in1/2-octave steps) were used, L2 ranged from 10 to 85 dB SPL(-5dB steps), and L1was set according to the equation L1 = 0.4L2 +39 dB (Kummer et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103, 3431-3444, 1998)# for L2l evels up to 65 dB SPL, beyond which L1 = L2. For the same conditions as those used by Boege and Janssen, we observed a frequency effect such that correlations were higher for mid-frequency threshold comparisons. In addition, a larger proportion of conditions not meeting inclusion criteria at mid and high frequencies had hearing losses exceeding 30 dB HL, compared to lower frequencies. These results suggest that DPOAE I/O functions can be used to predict audiometric thresholds with greater accuracy at mid and high frequencies, but only when certain inclusion criteria are met. When the SNR inclusion criterion is not met, the expected amount of hearing loss increases. Increasing the range of input levels from 20-65 dB SPL to 10-85 dB SPL increased the number of functions meeting inclusion criteria and increased the overall correlation between DPOAE and behavioral thresholds.



  • Music Induced Hearing Loss: Early Detection with Otoacoustic Emissions (OAEs. by Jay Hall Ph.D.
    Level Intermediate
    Number of Slides 55
    Total file size 475 k
    Preview page Non Available

    Abstract:


  • Review of Clinical Applications of Otoacoustic Emissions. by Stavros Hatzopoulos Ph.D.
    Level Intermediate
    Number of Slides 55
    Total file size 2073 k
    Preview page Non Available

    Abstract:

    This is the abridged version of the course presented during the Master of Audiology at Ferrara University 1996.



  • TEOAE Suppression: Methods, Applications, Current Findings . by Linda J. Hood, Ph.D. and Shanda Brashears, M.C.D
    Level Intermediate
    Total File size 3500 k
    Preview page Available (100k)

    Abstract:

    The on-line lecture is an abridged version from a lecture Dr. Hood presented during the American Academy of Audiology Conference meeting of 2003.



  • Noise Induced Hearing Loss (NIHL) and OAEs by Giota lalaki, Ph.D.
    Level Intermediate
    Number of Slides 40
    Total file size 2506 k
    Preview page Available (142k)

    Abstract: The lecture is supplemental material to the July-Augus-September 2003 editorial by Dr. Lalaki. The material was presented as a guest lecture during the 2003 6th EFAS meeting at Crete, Greece.




  • Outcome Measures in Children with Auditory Neuropathy and Cochlear Implants by Ann Peterson, M.A.; Jon Shallop, Ph.D.; Alyce Breneman, M.A.; Julie Babb, M.A.; Colin Driscoll, M.D.; Lee Fabry, M.A.; Ruth Stoeckel, M.A.
    Level Intermediate
    Number of Slides 34
    Total file size 1541 k
    Preview page Available (165k)

    Abstract:




  • Otoacoustic Emissions: Clinical Applications in Adults. by Antonio Werner MD.
    Level Basic
    Number of Slides 24
    Total file size 781 k
    Preview page Available (144k)

    Abstract:





•  Basics of OAEs  •  Biophysics and OAEs  •  Clinical Applications of OAEs  •  Neonatal Screening  •  New methods for OAE signal analysis  •  Main